Tragic photos can change the course of history—but not always - National Geographic
Posted: 24 Jul 2020 11:45 AM PDT
The image is frightening. A corpse lies stiffly on a hospital bed, wrapped in plastic—a modern mummy. The room is dark, sterile, impersonal. No one sits with the body to mourn the life that was lost.A suspected victim of COVID-19, the person died in an Indonesian hospital. Nurses, fearful of infection, wound plastic around the body and sprayed it with disinfectant. Now it's utterly anonymous—physical characteristics shrouded, name and gender unknown, an object waiting to be discarded.Photojournalist Joshua Irwandi made the image while shadowing Indonesian hospital workers as part of a National Geographic Society grant. The photograph ricocheted through the nation of 270 million people, which has been slow to fight the global pandemic."It's clear that the power of this image has galvanized discussion about coronavirus," Irwandi said from his home in Indonesia.But is it enough to change the trajectory of the pandemic in Indonesia, where the Johns Hopkins University Coronavirus Tracker reported 4,665 deaths and 95,418 deaths as of July 24—a toll believed to be vastly undercounted?This sort of question arises every time a photograph seems to distill a current catastrophe. Can an image of death or suffering change public policy or popular sentiment? Even if images from the past have done so, do photographs retain this power in our image-saturated world? And if images can make a difference in the 21st century, what's taking so long?
Posted: 24 Jul 2020 01:50 PM PDT
this link is to an external site that may or may not meet accessibility guidelines.
|You are subscribed to email updates from "nat geo world" - Google News. |
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
|Email delivery powered by Google|
|Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States|